What happened to QAnon? What do you think of Joe Biden's call for "unity" (what a hypocrite!)? What is our post-election strategy? Why did Trump not pardon Julian Assange? How can we develop an emotional connection to Reason?

Join us LIVE on Thursday at 9pm EST. 

In a wide-ranging and very provocative dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche, she opened by commenting that if Joe Biden is truly committed to "unity", as he said in his Inauguration Address, he should adopt Pope Paul VI's encyclical, "Development Is the New Name of Peace", as his policy. This would require dropping "identity politics" and the Green New Deal -- which he shows no sign of doing -- in favor of the LaRouche movement's plan to create 1.5 billion productive jobs, including developing a modern health system in every nation to address the COVID pandemic.

When Abraham Lincoln stated in June 1858 that "A House divided against itself cannot stand", he was identifying the efforts of supporters of the British System, among southern planters and Boston-New York financial interests, to divide the U.S.  More than 160 years later, we are again caught in a battle between those War Hawks and neoliberals, who would divide us around phony, narrow interpretations of "self-interest", versus those committed to a national mission based on the American System.

The U.S. Presidency passed over today from the Trump Administration to the Biden Administration, amidst extreme physical constraints from the COVID-19 pandemic. But every bit as significant and dramatic as the virus, are the subversion operations associated with the dirty, Anglo-American intelligence operations to get Trump out of office in the U.S.—which go back to 2016 and before. The goals and perpetrators of the illegalities involved are a threat to the whole world, but they cannot prevail

Those committed to removing Donald Trump from office have applied the tactics of regime change "Color Revolutions" for the last four years, with an agenda of removing any opposition to their plans for a global banker's dictatorship called "The Great Reset."

The spectacle taking place on Jan. 20 in the nation’s Capital, as the 46th President of the United States is inaugurated before an “audience” of 26,000 armed soldiers, poses an existential question before the citizens of the nation, and to the citizens of the world. Will the US retain its sovereignty—as Ben Franklin said, “a Republic, if you can keep it”—or will the British finally be able to realize their 245-year intention to crush the upstart Republic, and return the “New World” to the Old World of the Empire?

With just a week remaining in President Donald Trump’s administration, his Office of the Controller of the Currency (within the U.S. Treasury) promulgated a “Fair Access to Financial Services” rule on Jan. 13 which has angered Wall Street and, no doubt, annoyed Windsor Castle and the Old Lady of Threadneedle Street. The rule, if enforced, would appear to rule “green finance” out of order in the United States banking system, in spite of the Network of Central Banks and Supervisors for Greening of the Financial System which the Federal Reserve just joined after four years of being scared out of it by the President.

As all eyes are focused on tomorrow's inauguration in Washington, D.C., the world's financial oligarchs are racing to put the Great Reset in place, i.e., a global banker's dictatorship designed to preserve and deepen the control of an alliance of private Central Banks over national economies.

Join us LIVE at 1pm EST on Monday, January 18. This event happens on the anniversary weekend commemorating the birthdays of both. Founding Father Benjamin Franklin, the leading scientist of the eighteenth century and the intellectual leader of the American Revolution, admonished his posterity that they had been given “a Republic, if you can keep it.” The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, America’s leading advocate in the 20th century for the fulfillment of the United States' Constitution through non-violent direct action, sought to do that, and succeeded. Now, it is our turn. Let us use this doubly significant occasion to reject toxic partisanship in favor of the measured, dispassionate examination of grievous violations of the national public trust that have been not only alleged but also documented by those in our nation that are often voiceless.