PDF

March 4—In key venues of international relations this week, it was evident not all nations are lining up behind the lies of the U.S./British/NATO bloc associated with the demand that the economy of Russia must be destroyed, and by extension, that of China too, and other targeted nations with them. The truth is—even if only partially presented and understood amidst the fierce media cover-up and social control—that the Western bloc has been encircling and provoking Russia for decades, as part of its intent to preserve the Western casino economy at all costs, especially now that the casino is untenable. Even the Green Reset gambit cannot put it back together again.

Get your copy today!

Download PDF
Contribute

Want Print? Contact us at: (202) 968-2893

Introduction:

How Did LaRouche Know?

Feb. 22, 2022—Russian President Putin just called the bluff of the war hawks trying to maintain their collapsing unipolar order. By recognizing the independence of Donetsk and Lugansk, the “breakaway republics” of Ukraine, he is offering to protect them from the escalating shelling and shooting coming from the Kiev-controlled side of the Line of Contact. Putin knows that no matter what Russia did, the West would respond with sanctions, because their goal is not peace, but the destruction of Russia’s economy, to force a regime change there, which he will not allow. The alternative is to organize a new security architecture — is anyone in the West listening?

In March 2020, The LaRouche Organization published the first of a series of editions of a pamphlet entitled “The Great Leap Backward: LaRouche Crushes the ‘Green New Deal’ Fraud.”

In the introduction we stated:

To maintain power after its financial system blew up in 2008, the British monarchy is now moving to implement their “Great Reset”—massive population reduction globally through the imposition of the “Green New Deal,” enforced by the financial oligarchy centered in the City of London. By imposing the “Great Reset,” the British monarchy risks the outbreak of war, which could quickly lead to nuclear war, given that its targets include China and Russia.

Prescient, you might say, but associates of Lyndon LaRouche understand the modus operandi of the oligarchy we are up against. The “Green New Deal,” as defined by Prince Charles at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, has nothing to do with saving the environment, and everything to do with global domination and stopping human development.

The COP26 Summit, now known as “Flop26,” defeated largely through our international efforts, was a disaster for the global elites. At that summit, Prince Charles—who delivered the keynote—demanded a “vast military-style campaign to marshal the strength of the global private sector to achieve fundamental Green economic transition.” The Presidents of Russia and China committed the “crime” of boycotting the summit, refusing to commit national suicide for the financial oligarchy, and leaders of many other nations followed suit. India refused to submit as well.
NATO immediately ratcheted up the tension against Russia, warning it not to invade Ukraine, even as NATO troops expanded their presence in the region. As the West threatens to expand its military might to the border of Russia, Russia is denounced as the “aggressor,” and lunatics such as Senator Roger Wicker (R-MS) threaten the use of first strike nuclear weapons, consider that LaRouche told you exactly what this was about in a January 18, 2012 webcast. In discussing the October 20, 2011 murder of Libya’s Muammar Qaddafi, LaRouche stated:
They said, “We can not allow ourselves to be tied up with a long delay, bringing to conclusion, this Libya case.” Why? Because, they said, “we intend to start wars immediately against two West Asian nations: Syria and Iran.”
Now, the purpose of doing this was not to conduct a war against Syria and Iran—that was not the purpose. That was the sideshow. What you had, if you looked at the map, and looked at the Eastern Mediterranean and the bay around Iran, you saw the greatest concentration of thermonuclear-warfare capabilities on this planet, represented by the forces of the United States, Britain, and other powers. Why would they have to have the thermonuclear capabilities of major powers and others combined, against two small nations—a relatively very small nation, Syria, and a medium-size small nation, shall we say, Iran: Why?
Because… the target was Russia and China. What does that mean? Why should Britain and the United States, and other nations, wish to launch thermonuclear war, against two great thermonuclear powers, Russia and China? …

So therefore, what’s the point? … what’s the purpose of this? They told you: The purpose is, as the Queen of England and others have insisted, their intention is to reduce the population of the planet, from 7 billion people to 1 or less! Their argument is the Green policy, and what that connotes: You cannot tolerate Russia’s existence; you can not tolerate 1.4 billion people in China; you can not tolerate 1.1 billion people in India, and other nations. Therefore, this is a British operation, run under the Green policy of Her Majesty the Queen and her cohorts to change the character of the planet, in this way. In other words, these guys make Hitler look like a piker!

It’s time to reject the nightmare world of Global Britain and instead cooperate with Russia and China for a world peace based on development!

Table of Contents

PDF

Feb. 14—The Biden Administration, with a very bad misjudgment of the real condition of Afghanistan after 20 years of NATO’s war there, made a rushed pull-out and then moved to seize all the country’s cash and punish its people with no food, medical care or shelter in the dead of winter. It never even told America’s NATO “allies” what it was doing. It’s leaving a country destroyed.

PDF

Feb. 13—The question of what will happen next, and when, in the contrived confrontation by the NATO bloc against Russia in Europe, remains hanging in the air and very dangerous. More counter forces of sanity are speaking out, but a decisive break is urgent.

PDF

In an op-ed published on Feb. 11, 2022, by the French “souverainist” weekly Marianne, Peter Dittus and Hervé Hannoun, argue in favor of a French exit from the integrated command of NATO. The German economist Peter Dittus is the former secretary general of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), while Frenchman Hannoun is its deputy director general. We reprint it here in full:

PDF

Feb.12—The Chickenhawks running the Biden Administration—Tony Blinken and Jake Sullivan—have declared that their psychotic plan to unleash the well-armed and well-trained Nazi militia in Ukraine against the Donbas is set to be implemented in the coming week. While Blinken and Sullivan say that a “Russian invasion of Ukraine can come at any moment,” unnamed sources in the White House and in NATO have informed the media that this will take place precisely on Wednesday, Feb. 16. The plan, they failed to report, is to provoke a response from the Russian military to defend their compatriots among the Ukrainian citizens in the Donbas from this Nazi assault, which will then be declared the much-anticipated “Russian invasion.” This, they imagine, will detonate either the West’s “nuclear sanctions” option, which they believe will destroy Russia (but which will do far greater damage to the Anglo-American allies in Europe), or they will go straight to military warfare. Given that the U.S. has just completed a nuclear war-fighting exercise “Global Lightning,” based on the insane, utopian fantasy that a prolonged nuclear war could be fought and won, the human race is facing an existential question—do we have the moral fitness to survive?

PDF

Feb 5—At 4:00 p.m. on Friday afternoon (Feb. 4), the following headline appeared on the Bloomberg News website: “Russia Invades Ukraine.” Note that it was then midnight in Moscow, and that President Vladimir Putin was not in the country, but in Beijing. For a full 30 minutes, this headline remained on the website, before it was finally removed, with Bloomberg News posting an attempted apology: “We prepare headlines for many scenarios and one of those headlines was inadvertently published at around 4 p.m. ET today on our website. We deeply regret the error.”

PDF

What if the U.S. and the U.K. declared war, but nobody came? Day after day the U.S. and U.K. media post screaming headlines about the imminent Russian invasion of Ukraine. Today’s edition includes the Daily Mail reporting that the U.K. government will announce moves to “target Russia’s strategic and financial interests tomorrow,” while Foreign Secretary Liz Truss ranted to Sky News: “Currently, the economic sanctions are fairly narrowly drawn, so we could only target companies with a direct involvement in destabilizing Ukraine. What we are looking to do is widen that so any company of interest to the Kremlin and the regime in Russia would be able to be targeted, so there will be nowhere to hide for Putin’s oligarchs, for Russian companies involved in propping up the Russian state. That’s what we are looking at doing this week.”

PDF

The Russian Federation continues to insist that the United States and NATO commit to satisfying Russia’s need for assurances that its national security requirements will be respected. But the responses this week — delivered officially by the U.S. and NATO — fall far short of the mark. While offering room for negotiation on secondary matters, the U.S. and NATO have given no positive response on Russia’s core security demands.

PDF

Today Secretary of State Antony Blinken held a State Department press conference, and closed-door sessions with members of Congress, announcing that the U.S. has provided written responses to Russia’s December texts of proposed security agreements. He also stated, “Additionally, NATO developed and will deliver to Moscow its own paper with ideas and concerns about collective security in Europe—and that paper fully reinforces ours, and vice versa. There is no daylight among the United States and our allies and partners on these matters.”